<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Contractor Insurance And Risk Management Blog &#187; Construction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contractor-insure.com/blog/index.php/tag/construction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contractor-insure.com/blog</link>
	<description>Where Home Builders And Trade Contractors Turn For Advice!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:27:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Still Need Workers Compensation Even If Insured Subcontractors Used?</title>
		<link>http://www.contractor-insure.com/blog/index.php/2008/12/still-need-workers-compensation-even-if-insured-subcontractors-used/</link>
		<comments>http://www.contractor-insure.com/blog/index.php/2008/12/still-need-workers-compensation-even-if-insured-subcontractors-used/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Workers' Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insured Subcontractor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contractor-insure.com/blog/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The second most common myth regarding Workers Compensation for the construction industry is &#8220;I don&#8217;t need to carry Workers Compensation insurance since I only use insured subcontractors and do not have any direct employees&#8221;.
Like the other myths I will be discussing, this is not necessarily accurate.
Even if you have a current certificate of insurance on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second most common myth regarding Workers Compensation for the construction industry is &#8220;I don&#8217;t need to carry Workers Compensation insurance since I only use insured subcontractors and do not have any direct employees&#8221;.</p>
<p>Like the other myths I will be discussing, this is not necessarily accurate.</p>
<p>Even if you have a current certificate of insurance on all of your subcontractors showing that they carry Workers Compensation, you are still not adequately protected.  In fact, all it means is that at the time the certificate was issued they had insurance in place.</p>
<p>If the subcontractor&#8217;s insurance is canceled after the certificate is issued, it is very unlikely you will be notified.  Neither the insurance agent nor the insurance company is legally obligated to notify you.  The certificate merely states that they will &#8220;<em>endeavor to</em>&#8221; let you know the coverage is no longer in force.  With the current state of the economy, it is becoming more and more common for the subcontractor to obtain insurance in order to have the certificate issued, and then letting the policy cancel for non-payment.  The end result is that you will still end up with an uninsured subcontractor desite your efforts.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the best way to protect yourself and your assets is to purchase your own Workers Compensation policy and add the subcontractor classification codes on an &#8220;if any&#8221; payroll basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.contractor-insure.com/blog/index.php/2008/12/still-need-workers-compensation-even-if-insured-subcontractors-used/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
