Contractors: Accurately Project Payrolls & Subcontractor Costs

2 January 2009

I was talking to a new business prospect the other day (I’ll call him Steve), gathering information to quote the insurance for his residential construction business.  When I asked Steve about his employee payroll and any amounts paid to uninsured subcontractors, he stated that he wanted to underestimate them so he wouldn’t have to pay so much money upfront.  After all, the economy is rough and he thought he might be better equipped financially to pay the additional premiums after the audits had been completed.
 
This thought process is more common than you might think, and it is extremely dangerous!  During my years in the insurance industry I’ve seen way too many businesses go bankrupt because of underestimating their payrolls and gross sales.
 
The reality is that additional premiums resulting from an audit are due within 30 days and can NOT be financed.  If you can’t pay the audit additional premiums when due the insurance company will cancel your current policies.  Once your policies are canceled, along with any certificates of insurance that may have been issued, your business comes to a halt.  No insurance = no certificates; no certificates = no jobs.  In addition, the insurance company will turn the unpaid debt over to a collection agency, which will impact your credit score.
 
The next thing I usually hear when I explain this is:  “Well, I’ll just get insurance with another insurance company and/or agent.”
 
Unfortunately, unpaid audit premiums must be disclosed on the insurance applications, as well as the reason for your prior insurance policies being canceled.  Believe me when I tell you that no insurance company is going to write a policy for you if you owe another insurance company money.  Their reasoning is that you didn’t pay the other company, so you probably won’t pay them either.  If you don’t disclose the information on the applications then you have committed fraud, which is a blog topic all in itself.
 
In conclusion, the best course of action is to be as accurate as possible when estimating employee payrolls and subcontractor costs to minimize large audit additional premiums.  It’s much easier to spread the premiums out over months than to try and come up with the money in 30 days.


Problem General Liability Exclusions For Contractors

18 December 2008

Most General Liability insurance carriers are wary of insuring contractors as a result of a high frequency and severity of construction defect claims that have occurred nationwide. As a result, many insurance carriers, especially those in the excess & surplus lines marketplace, are frequently using the following exclusions that take away much needed coverages:
 
* Residential Construction Exclusion: Believe it or not, residential construction is riskier than commercial construction due to the the frequent class action lawsuits filed within certain subdivisions.
 
* Tract / Row / Condo / Town Home Exclusion: These types of project are considered risky since they seem to invite class action lawsuits as well as lawsuits from home owners associations looking for a deep pocket to fund normal maintenance and wear and tear issues just prior to the running of a statute of repose for construction defect lawsuits.
 
* Subcontracted Work Exclusion: Many policy forms actually exclude lawsuits arising out of work performed by subcontractors.
 
* Product And Completed Operations Exclusions: Some carriers that want to eliminate almost all of their risk for construction defect claims will insert this exclusion.
 
Why would insurance carriers and agents that cater to contractors even offer a policy with these exclusions to their clients that would be negatively impacted? This is a good question that defies logic. As a general rule, only insurance agents that are inexperienced would set up their contractor clients with such deficient policies. An insurance agent that is knowledgeable and specialized in contractors would know how to find carriers that don’t have these problem exclusions.
 
Furthermore, these problem exclusions are just the tip of the iceberg when designing quality coverages for contractors.
 
Source: Trina Swartz, Beware Of Leaky Contractors Coverage, Agent Market Source, Fall/Winter 2008-2009
 
 
 
 
 
 


Green Building Insurance Challenges

18 December 2008

As was discussed in a previous blog posting entitled “Green Building Risk Management Obstacles”, there are many potential risks involved in the emerging field of green building. Current insurance policy forms may not provide adequate coverage for all green building risks at this time.
 
To follow is a summary of the types of policies that are needed:
 
General Liability: Current General Liability forms may adequately cover claims for negligence resulting in bodily injury and property damage.
 
Bonding:  Current License And Permit Bonds may provide limited protection against the risk that the project will not be completed per state and local code requirements. Surety Bond forms may adequately protect against the risk that the job will not be completed per the plans and specifications or due to financial problems of the contractor.
 
Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions): Professional Liability insurance is needed to protect against pure economic damages (not associated with bodily injury and property damage) in the event that the green goals are not accomplished resulting in financial loss to the buyer in terms of increased annual operations expenses, lack of savings, or loss of resale value. This type of Professional Liability form for green contractors is not widely available in the market and as a result a specialist insurance agent should be approached for placement.
 

Source: Green Building: New Benefits For Society And New Challenges For Risk Management; Insurance Journal, November 17, 2008; Vol. 86, No. 22; by Kenneth C. Gibbs
 


Green Building Risk Management Obstacles

18 December 2008

Theodore L. Senet, a noted Los Angeles construction and insurance attorney, recently listed nine risk management issues dealing with green construction:
 
1. Compliance with developing green building codes and local requirements
2. Compliance with contract requirements related to certification levels
3. Compliance with contract requirements related to energy savings and operational performance
4. Obtaining tax incentives or meeting tax credit requirements
5. Meeting investment criteria and financing requirements
6. Additional time and costs related to the design, approval and fabrication of new building products and systems
7 The ability of new green products and systems to perform to traditional performance standards
8. The sequencing, constructability and commissioning of new systems, products and processes
9. Compliance with project schedules and the impact on fast track projects
 
Source: Green Building: New Benefits For Society And New Challenges For Risk Management; Insurance Journal, November 17, 2008; Vol. 86, No. 22; by Kenneth C. Gibbs
 


Still Need Workers Compensation Even If Insured Subcontractors Used?

10 December 2008

The second most common myth regarding Workers Compensation for the construction industry is “I don’t need to carry Workers Compensation insurance since I only use insured subcontractors and do not have any direct employees”.

Like the other myths I will be discussing, this is not necessarily accurate.

Even if you have a current certificate of insurance on all of your subcontractors showing that they carry Workers Compensation, you are still not adequately protected.  In fact, all it means is that at the time the certificate was issued they had insurance in place.

If the subcontractor’s insurance is canceled after the certificate is issued, it is very unlikely you will be notified.  Neither the insurance agent nor the insurance company is legally obligated to notify you.  The certificate merely states that they will “endeavor to” let you know the coverage is no longer in force.  With the current state of the economy, it is becoming more and more common for the subcontractor to obtain insurance in order to have the certificate issued, and then letting the policy cancel for non-payment.  The end result is that you will still end up with an uninsured subcontractor desite your efforts.

In conclusion, the best way to protect yourself and your assets is to purchase your own Workers Compensation policy and add the subcontractor classification codes on an “if any” payroll basis.


Are All Contractors Required To Carry Workers Compensation?

8 December 2008

I have been in the insurance industry for longer than I care to say, and there are numerous myths that seem to endure over time.  In an attempt to put these myths to rest I will be be discussing some of the more “common” ones in a series of blogs.
 
One of the most common ones regarding Workers Compensation for a General Contractor (builder and remodeler) is:  “I’m not required to carry Workers’ Compensation under state law because I don’t have four or more employees”.

The fact is that this is more complicated than it seems at first glance.  If an employer is required to carry Workers’ Compensation but does not do so, the injured worker can file his Workers’ Compensation claim with the state’s Uninsured Employer’s Fund and will get paid the traditional benefits.  The state’s Uninsured Employer’s Fund will then file a lien against the non-complying employer for the amount of the payout and can levy substantial fines against the employer in addition to the benefits.

 After I tell my client this, their next response is sometimes “Can’t I file the claim under my General Liability policy?”.  The answer to this is very simple - “No”, as these types of claims are excluded.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Employment Practices Liability - Why Do I Need It?

25 November 2008

Employers of all sizes are exposed to legal actions filed by current or former employees that allege discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, and other charges. Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI) covers lawsuits brought by employees (past, present or prospects), or governmental entities against the insured employer, alleging wrongful discharge, discrimination or certain types of harassment.   EPL coverage is excluded under most General Liability policies but can be written on a stand-alone policy.

Claims can arise from employees being offended by cartoons, jokes, suggestive comments from supervisors and/or co-workers (sexual harassment); termination of an older employee or failure to promote an older employee (age discrimination); overbearing supervisors (hostile work environment); different rules for men and women in the same positions (sex discrimination); etc.  As you can imagine, the potential for Employment Practices Liability claims are almost endless and usually very expensive.

I recently read about an EPL claim where the administrative assistant in an attorney’s office (I’ll call her Sue) was terminated after 15 years of employment.  Sue’s supervisor (I’ll call her Helen) was much younger than Sue and was constantly criticizing Sue’s work and attitude.  Sue had never received any negative reviews prior to Helen.  After Helen conducted Sue’s annual review (which was negative and alleged poor work performance and attitude problems) Sue was terminated.  Sue then filed a lawsuit against her employer for age discrimination (Sue is in her late 50’s) and hostile work environment (harassment by Helen), won her lawsuit and was awarded a settlement of over $1,000,000 plus court costs.

Many cases have involved female employees suing their employers for sex discrimination when a male co-worker (with the same or less  credentials as the females) was promoted over them.  Some of these claims have involved large, well known companies such as Wal-Mart and Publix Supermarket.

We also see quite a few claims for sexual harassment.  The days of posting or passing around cartoons and jokes or commenting on a co-workers appearance and/or clothing and not getting into trouble are a thing of the past.  It’s often difficult to draw the line between innocent fun and malicious abuse.

With today’s “I’ll sue you”, it’s not my fault”, politically correct mind set these claims are becoming more and more frequent. 

I strongly urge every employer to sit down with their insurance agent and discuss this very valuable, but often overlooked, insurance protection!


What Does the Home Builders Association Do For Its Members?

21 November 2008

As an agency that specializes in the insurance and business needs of the Residential Construction industry, I am asked almost daily by my insureds about WHY they should join their local Home Builders Association (HBA) - what are they getting for their money?   With the economy in it’s current state, this question has become more and more frequent.  All they see at first glance are the membership fee (which can range anywhere from $400 to $600 depending on the local association), monthly meetings and dinners.  While the monthly meetings and dinners focus on education and networking there is much, much more going on.

Activities in Congress, the federal agencies, the courts, and state and local governments affect the housing industry and the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) is actively involved on many fronts to make sure that housing remains a priority in the public policy arena.

Membership in your local HBA automatically makes you a member of the NAHB.  The NAHB has a professional staff of more than 300 in Washington, DC.  Its various divisions:

Being a member of the HBA shows that you are a professional who is committed to the building industry.

To learn more about the benefits of being a member:  http://www.nahb.org/generic.aspx?sectionID=101

To find the HBAs in your area, go the the National Association’s website: http://www.nahb.org/local_association_search_form.aspx


Rental Cars and Hired Car Physical Damage

6 November 2008

Dave, a client of mine, called the other day to let me know he was going on a business trip, and asked about whether or not he should buy the rental car company’s Physical Damage Waiver, or just add Hired Car Physical Damage to his business auto policy.  I explained to Dave that while the Hired Car Physical Damage would provide coverage if the rental car sustained damage, it would not address three key provisions of the rental car contract - replace cost valuation, loss of use and diminution of value.

The commercial auto policy uses the Actual Cash Value method if a car is totaled, which is cost new less depreciation.  This can be a significant difference from the replacement cost of the vehicle.

With regard to loss of use, I’ve never seen an insurance company pay for this as there is no provision in the business automobile policy that would grant such coverage.  Loss of use means the rental car company would have to have every other car they have in that category rented in order to suffer a monetary loss by not being able to rent the vehicle damaged in the collision.

With regard to diminution of value, most rental car contracts want to recoup the loss they will incur upon sale of the rental car when it is time to remove it from the fleet.  The fact that the car was involved in a crash must be disclosed to the buyer, and the sales price will be reduced as a result.

Due to the above uncertainties, the safest course of action is to always purchase the Physical Damage Waiver from the rental car company.


Garage Doors Susceptible To Tornado Winds

20 October 2008

The collapse of garage doors during a tornado can set off a chain reaction that destroys the rest of the house according to some experts.
 
The Department Of Industry and Labor in Minnesota recently upgraded the standard for garage doors by requiring them to withstand a 90 mph wind gust for three seconds.
 
See complete article:Garage Doors Can Be Weak Point In Tornado Damage


Next Page »